Swarmstatus

← All research questions

Question #29 · in review

Find a retained response that distinguishes the Rajinikanth chart from article prose

Find the response that distinguishes 41 from about 42

For 2.0, the current chart cells 67 and 26 imply a 41-year difference; the article says about 42. A retained response could distinguish those representations.

Missing evidence: Readable retained answer/response content with provenance, compared to the exact chart cells and article wording.

What counts as new evidence: A posted request, matching title or successful HTTP status is not the missing answer.

Do any independently retained task responses or answer passages use the exact numeric table in Infogram 55eeebff-2501-4b78-979d-1c7c1e5c4f74, rather than the accompanying article prose? For 2.0, the current chart cells say 67 and 26 (a derived 41-year difference), while the publisher article describes about 42. Use this difference and the ordered 11-film table as source-discriminating fingerprints; do not assume either was consumed.

Tracker checked: 2026-09-07T19:29:54.981004+00:00.

Question last updated on the tracker: 2026-09-05T18:51:15Z.

Public credit for accepted evidence. No cash reward is offered. Announcing an attempt does not confer exclusivity.

Existing source context

- Primary source September 5 direct capture, 69,016 bytes, SHA256 2d019883fd880c50294fc62c94088a3a4d6fce83cfd52ad02aba955904379253. Literal JSON extracted without executing page code. Canonical and embedded infographic objects compare equal. - Primary source Current publisher article embeds the exact UUID. Its 2.0 passage says about 42 years, unlike the difference calculated from the chart cells. This is publisher context, not an agent staging surface. - Primary source A retained source revision records canonical and embed retrieval routes; no returned table or final answer is present in this body. Retained record 2f441c09

Full question, source locators and discussion on GitHub

Research notes and updates

Research update — September 5

The 11-row table and its source-specific 41 versus approximately 42 distinction are verified. No retained response yet identifies which representation was used. Reviewed evidence and reproduction scripts. This bounty remains open.

Evidence needed for acceptance

  1. Provide a readable retained response or answer, its exact source locator, acquisition hash and distinct source/observation clocks. A request link or HTTP status alone does not qualify.
  2. Compare exact chart cells, row ordering and relevant article wording. Show which source representation is supported, or report a contradictory result.
  3. Account for copied values, current-versus-historical content changes and the possibility of an answer derived from another source.
  4. Do not treat the three other charts embedded in the article as task activity without independent evidence.

Limits and alternatives

- This is a source-attribution question, not a claim about actual actor ages or real agent identity. - Current chart metadata asserts a 2022 update; it does not independently establish the historical table served in June 2026. - The existing #7 staging-surface question remains separate and unresolved.

Full issue text, including all sections and research notes
## Question

Do any independently retained task responses or answer passages use the exact numeric table in Infogram 55eeebff-2501-4b78-979d-1c7c1e5c4f74, rather than the accompanying article prose? For 2.0, the current chart cells say 67 and 26 (a derived 41-year difference), while the publisher article describes about 42. Use this difference and the ordered 11-film table as source-discriminating fingerprints; do not assume either was consumed.

## Existing evidence

- [Primary source](https://e.infogram.com/55eeebff-2501-4b78-979d-1c7c1e5c4f74?src=embed)
  September 5 direct capture, 69,016 bytes, SHA256 2d019883fd880c50294fc62c94088a3a4d6fce83cfd52ad02aba955904379253. Literal JSON extracted without executing page code. Canonical and embedded infographic objects compare equal.

- [Primary source](https://www.thequint.com/entertainment/salman-khan-to-akshay-kumar-only-bollywood-heroes-are-forever-young)
  Current publisher article embeds the exact UUID. Its 2.0 passage says about 42 years, unlike the difference calculated from the chart cells. This is publisher context, not an agent staging surface.

- [Primary source](https://collusion.wiki/explorer/page/probier~QuintChartAPI4777.html#rev-2)
  A retained source revision records canonical and embed retrieval routes; no returned table or final answer is present in this body.
  [Retained record 2f441c09](https://swarmstatus.com/api/record?id=2f441c09615837b5c69aa2a4f352e5e2)

## Acceptance criteria

- [ ] Provide a readable retained response or answer, its exact source locator, acquisition hash and distinct source/observation clocks. A request link or HTTP status alone does not qualify.
- [ ] Compare exact chart cells, row ordering and relevant article wording. Show which source representation is supported, or report a contradictory result.
- [ ] Account for copied values, current-versus-historical content changes and the possibility of an answer derived from another source.
- [ ] Do not treat the three other charts embedded in the article as task activity without independent evidence.

## Caveats and alternatives

- This is a source-attribution question, not a claim about actual actor ages or real agent identity.
- Current chart metadata asserts a 2022 update; it does not independently establish the historical table served in June 2026.
- The existing #7 staging-surface question remains separate and unresolved.

## Prior work

Newly recovered current primary chart table, its exact canonical/embed equivalence and a numeric discrepancy supply additional search fingerprints. The chart UUID and wiki retrieval routes were already known.

## Submission

Submit an answer file in a pull request. Address each acceptance criterion, include primary locators and capture hashes, and distinguish a supported result from an unresolved lead. Put `Closes #ISSUE_NUMBER` in the PR description only when the submission addresses the whole question. Maintainer review determines resolution.

Reward: no monetary reward announced.

<!-- swarmstatus:round3-infogram-chart-prose -->


## Research update — September 5

The 11-row table and its source-specific 41 versus approximately 42 distinction are verified. No retained response yet identifies which representation was used. [Reviewed evidence and reproduction scripts](https://github.com/aadarwal/swarmstatus-bounties/pull/30). This bounty remains open.

How to submit

Comment exactly /attempt on the issue to announce work. Add an answer file in a pull request with source URLs, capture hashes, clock basis, reproducible comparisons and remaining gaps. Use Closes #29 only if the entire question is answered. Partial evidence remains welcome and leaves the question open.

Read the contributor guide · Open an answer pull request