Open research · Public credit
Choose a question, preserve the source, and submit a reproducible answer. Every question below describes what is still missing.
Public credit for accepted evidence. No cash reward is offered. An /attempt announces intent; it does not reserve a question or guarantee acceptance.
Last verified tracker snapshot: 2026-09-07T18:38:44.895801+00:00. Status may have changed. Confirm on the issue before starting.
/attempt on its GitHub issue.#29 · in review
For 2.0, the current chart cells 67 and 26 imply a 41-year difference; the article says about 42. A retained response could distinguish those representations.
Missing evidence: Readable retained answer/response content with provenance, compared to the exact chart cells and article wording.
What counts as new evidence: A posted request, matching title or successful HTTP status is not the missing answer.
#33 · open
The same USAspending and SF133 blocks occur beneath different paste parents. Their origin and copying direction remain unknown.
Missing evidence: A preserved, independently dated task or template beyond the retained copies, with exact ordered correspondence and a reproducible comparison.
What counts as new evidence: The duplicate bodies and native parent links are already verified; the missing piece is dated source context.
#22 · open
The exact chart is readable today and an archived publisher page cites it. Historical chart JSON and independent task staging remain unresolved.
Missing evidence: Full resolution needs a retained historical data/configuration body and an independent task-bearing publication outside the Vanderbilt alias cluster that cites the complete chart ID. Either alone is a useful partial.
What counts as new evidence: A current publisher chart or archived iframe citation alone does not establish historical numerical values.
#65 · in review
What body resulted from the first of two recorded section saves to PoliceWageAgeSequenceMar10Collab on June 20, 2026, and what evidence can distinguish successive appends or stale-section reuse from an input that already contained duplicate text? The concrete missing artifact is the body after the 03:43:43 UTC save and before the 03:45:08 UTC save. A…
Missing evidence: Recover a source-qualified body resulting from the first save, or returned archive/body and transformation evidence that discriminates where the duplicate section entered this exact sequence. Identify the precise page, source-scoped version or event, readable bytes, SHA-256, capture provenance…
#59 · in review
What primary data table or documented reproducible query matches all nine values below for Roi Et province (TH45), males not in the labor force because of studies, Quarter 2? Recover the age range, unit and series version from evidence; those dimensions are missing from the paste. Thailand’s National Statistical Office (NSO) is a proposed source family,…
Missing evidence: An answer should provide: - An exact public source URL and table/series identifier, or a documented query with enough filter and extraction detail to reproduce the result. - Evidence for the entire selector conjunction: Roi Et/TH45, males, not in the labor force, studies, Quarter 2; document…
#58 · open
Which source dataset, versioned export or archived response supports the exact France cars/light-trucks energy table for 2006–2010 stored in these two Faster-it objects? Recover the source provenance and compare all selectors and five ordered rows.
Missing evidence: 1. Retain an independently located source artifact with publisher, exact file/row or response locator, bytes/hash and dataset version or release where available. Separate acquisition clocks from source dates and any historical archive evidence. 2. Establish the complete selector/field bundle and…
#56 · in review
Which underlying standings artifact and ranking definition account for the opposite 1996/97 away ranks asserted for Sunderland and Middlesbrough in two retained EPL paste tables? Recover source-qualified data and explicit ordering rules sufficient to reproduce the ranks, or show that the two texts use different definitions. Neither paste is currently…
Missing evidence: 1. Retain a primary standings artifact or source response for the exact competition, 1996/97 season and away-table selection, with original bytes, hash, locator and separately stated acquisition/source dates. Include enough standings context to establish global ranks, including the relevant…
#54 · open
Thirteen public K4be pastes currently declare creation dates from 14 December 2025 to 1 March 2026. When can their complete stored bodies first be independently shown to have been public, and is there a specific evidenced relationship to the later task-sharing corpus? The early dates are service assertions captured on September 5, not established…
Missing evidence: Recover an independently dated, source-located historical artifact for an exact listed object that preserves its complete stored body. Supply the original bytes or a public-safe reproducible package, content hash, exact locator, acquisition provenance and capture-clock/timezone basis.
#52 · in review
A retained wiki report says a California backup counter was incremented during the fifth question of a language-statistics task. Can a dated historical response and a recipient observation corroborate that backup signal? The wiki already contains written verification and thanks about the primary CA5 signal. Those messages matter, but they do not…
Missing evidence: Preserve a historical, source-located response/state or transaction for the exact backup key, with readable bytes, content hash, acquisition provenance and clock basis. Explain its relation to the reported R5 event; a new current lookup does not answer this.
#46 · open
What is the earliest independently verifiable body capture of Jotspot’s Economics reference reading 2010 note containing its exact Clark newsletter reference? Determine whether that evidence supports, narrows or contradicts the note’s displayed creation and modification dates.
Missing evidence: Supply an independently timestamped body capture or native revision for this exact Jotspot object, with its public locator, relevant content, acquisition provenance and digest.
#24 · open
Determine whether the retained DataUSACashiersMastersSequenceLive3 history supports a complete request → exact later task wording/value → specific acknowledgement chain, and identify any missing independently evidenced stage. Start with the clock-pair requests and later marker below, using every actual intervening revision.
Missing evidence: Provide exact public source locators plus retained content or archive evidence and its acquisition date.
#23 · open
Using native revision identifiers, RCS paths/content hashes and independent timestamps, determine which records can be mapped across the original prowiki and later DSE exports before estimating any clock offset. Resolve the concrete dse~RecentChanges@77 collision as a negative control and provide at least one independently anchored same-event comparison.
Missing evidence: Provide exact public source locators plus retained content or archive evidence and its acquisition date.
#21 · in review
Find an independent retained artifact with the ordered counties 05000US06023 → 05000US08069 → 05000US12011 → 05000US38017 → 05000US30031, ipeds_completions, CIP4:1107, Year:2013 and Completions. Determine whether the order comes from a task prompt, a copied query block or another reproducible source.
Missing evidence: Provide exact public source locators plus retained content or archive evidence and its acquisition date.
#20 · open
Find another independently retained task artifact carrying worldPovertyRegion for both 2018 and 2020, dailySpending=2.15, the country set AFG/GHA/NGA/IND/MEX and ruralValue/headcount. Compare wrapper and selection-set differences without counting the three identical wiki bodies as independent task origins.
Missing evidence: Provide exact public source locators plus retained content or archive evidence and its acquisition date.
#19 · open
Recover an independent historical body capture or native revision history for the task-bearing Demo, Gründer or Semantic Dictionary pages. Determine which task text demonstrably existed before the September discovery, and which is known only from the current page plus a displayed recent-changes date.
Missing evidence: Provide exact public source locators plus retained content or archive evidence and its acquisition date.
#18 · open
Can any exact Iowa paste request and its claimed answer be joined through a retained parent/reply relation, explicit source link, or independent read/acknowledgement evidence? Start with the agent-0227 cache request/replies and Q5 wording, rather than treating adjacent static pastes as a conversation.
Missing evidence: Provide exact public source locators plus retained content or archive evidence and its acquisition date.
#16 · in review
Recover the DataUSA ipeds_completions rows for University 153658 and 215062, each Gender 1 and 2, drilldowns Year,CIP6, measures Completions, top=5.Year.Completions.desc. Explain how these receipt queries relate to retained variants using Year=2016,2017,2018 and top=3.Year.Completions.desc.
Missing evidence: Supply a retained artifact or archive capture with a stable URL, acquisition date, source date when available, and a content hash.
#15 · open
Locate a retained primary publication linking PBS-dashboard-AgeGroup-Monthly-date-20241128/PBSdashboard to Victoria, Wodonga or Ballarat, and Dermatologicals. Establish how its filter names and data period relate to the later PBS-dashboard-AgeGroup-Monthly-date-20250430 and PBSdashboardallATC1-ATC2medicines-Agegroup workbooks.
Missing evidence: Supply a retained artifact or archive capture with a stable URL, acquisition date, source date when available, and a content hash.
#13 · open
A September 5 direct Investor.gov capture is now retained: 147,840 bytes, SHA256 19f21855d65a95e4fecd49ee1dd0127748dbebb1eb218c4c877efbc707093297. Its bytes match the hash and size reported for the June 18 SEC county.json response, and a proposed reproducible comparison matches the 25 retained Massachusetts rows and three slices. Can an independently…
Missing evidence: Supply a retained artifact or archive capture with a stable URL, acquisition date, source date when available, and a content hash.
#12 · open
Locate a retained task, paste, wiki body or other publication that contains AGE115_MentalhealthinAgedCare_19072024/F05-Age-specificcruderates together with Cohort=Permanent residential aged care and Condition=Mood disorders. Does an independent artifact connect those complete constraints to the documented research corpus?
Missing evidence: Supply a retained artifact or archive capture with a stable URL, acquisition date, source date when available, and a content hash.
#11 · in review
Search for the ordered pair GDDY then TWLO with from=to=20191115, including direct Yahoo Japan routes and embedded markdown.new targets. Find an additional staging artifact and distinguish copied source blocks from an independently timestamped observation.
Missing evidence: Provide exact source locators, retained content and an acquisition timestamp; include an archive/provider timestamp when available.
#10 · open
Use the CashierCoordJan08OAI cashier-to-UNCTAD overwrite as a negative control. Identify further pages whose retained revisions switch unrelated task targets, and quantify which whole-object similarity claims would disappear when evidence is restricted to introduced targets in a coherent revision interval.
Missing evidence: Supply a reproducible query/script over source-qualified revisions, with before/after record IDs and retained text for every reported transition.
#9 · in review
The identical alias nrcnaepres9983 and grade 12 science 2019 HAOHTAIC query occur at both Vanderbilt and RMN. Find a third independently sourced registration or message with the same high-entropy alias/query pair, and test whether the current entries are copied/imported records or separate registrations.
Missing evidence: Provide exact source locators, retained content and an acquisition timestamp; include an archive/provider timestamp when available.
#8 · in review
Find an additional staging artifact for the MSU Reporter 2018 Talking As Fast As I Can review that includes MemGator memento 20201020093440 or Wayback 20240623185914. Separate the archive snapshot requested from the date the staging artifact was published.
Missing evidence: Provide exact source locators, retained content and an acquisition timestamp; include an archive/provider timestamp when available.
#7 · in review
Locate an additional retained publication carrying UUID 55eeebff-2501-4b78-979d-1c7c1e5c4f74 and the Rajinikanth/The Quint canonical slug, or the same nested viewpagesource.online route. Determine whether it predates public disclosure rather than being a later copy.
Missing evidence: Provide exact source locators, retained content and an acquisition timestamp; include an archive/provider timestamp when available.
#6 · in review
Find another retained public artifact, outside the currently documented DSE and Probier objects, that carries SET50_MonthlyReport_20250131.pdf together with SET50_MonthlyReport_20241230.pdf or the same ordered format/proxy bundle.
Missing evidence: Provide exact source locators, retained content and an acquisition timestamp; include an archive/provider timestamp when available.
#5 · open
Can the exact 2019[46:52], 2020[52:62], 2021[82:91] slice sequence and thousands-USD conversion reveal a new public evidence surface outside the six frozen repositories and known referrer mirrors?
Missing evidence: Recover at least one complete existing record from a genuinely new source surface with a precise matching rule.
#4 · in review
What primary-source history explains code us-ma-760, offerings 1 and usd 14300 in the 2020 county data?
Missing evidence: Provide a dated primary dataset version, methodological note, correction or underlying filing that explains the code.
#3 · open
When was is.gd/e760dL created, and is there an existing source connecting it to the June 2019–2021 extraction sequence?
Missing evidence: Supply a native registration record or independent existing capture containing the exact alias and destination.
#2 · open
Is there a preserved initiating artifact or conversation that explains why masscfround0x260618–4x260618 and masscountysec02026–42026 registered identical ordered query URLs seconds apart?
Missing evidence: Identify at least one existing artifact containing the exact sequence or an explicit cross-reference between the alias families.
#1 · in review
The historical contents of cAKmcm9SE6lT remain unrecovered. Find an existing capture or preserved export showing what it held during the June 18 activity.
Missing evidence: One existing historical artifact with its original locator, acquisition date and hash; compare its schema and values with the primary county dataset.
What counts as new evidence: The object ID and indexed aliases are already known. Recreating the document or refetching current data would not establish its historical contents.