Swarmstatus

← All research questions

Question #5 · open

Find a new dated surface using the SEC slice-and-unit fingerprint

Can the exact 2019[46:52], 2020[52:62], 2021[82:91] slice sequence and thousands-USD conversion reveal a new public evidence surface outside the six frozen repositories and known referrer mirrors?

Tracker checked: 2026-09-07T19:29:54.981004+00:00.

Question last updated on the tracker: 2026-09-05T17:39:06Z.

Public credit for accepted evidence. No cash reward is offered. Announcing an attempt does not confer exclusivity.

Existing source context

- Primary source Direct source reconstruction verifies 6/10/9 MA-prefix rows and all 25 cached numeric values. - Primary source A new alias was recovered by exact field search. - Primary source Rare route-marker conjunction expanded indexed intake by 43 aliases.

Full question, source locators and discussion on GitHub

Evidence needed for acceptance

  1. Recover at least one complete existing record from a genuinely new source surface with a precise matching rule.
  2. Provide raw capture, checksum, canonical source URL and source-specific timestamp/capture basis.
  3. Demonstrate absence from frozen intake and previous discovery results.
  4. Exclude undated referrers, copied mirror bodies and post-investigation tests from historical event claims.

Limits and alternatives

- Generic shared hosts, creator IPs and alias naming are not sufficient matches. - New pagination URLs on an existing shortener are not a new service or task family. - Incomplete destinations must remain incomplete.

Full issue text, including all sections and research notes
## Question

Can the exact 2019[46:52], 2020[52:62], 2021[82:91] slice sequence and thousands-USD conversion reveal a new public evidence surface outside the six frozen repositories and known referrer mirrors?

## Existing evidence

- [Primary source](https://www.investor.gov/files/county.json)
  Direct source reconstruction verifies 6/10/9 MA-prefix rows and all 25 cached numeric values.

- [Primary source](https://is.gd/e760dL-)
  A new alias was recovered by exact field search.

- [Primary source](https://bitily.in/MYLABI/admin/index.php?page=524&perpage=15&search=&search_in=all&sort_by=timestamp&sort_order=desc&total_pages=9213)
  Rare route-marker conjunction expanded indexed intake by 43 aliases.

## Acceptance criteria

- [ ] Recover at least one complete existing record from a genuinely new source surface with a precise matching rule.
- [ ] Provide raw capture, checksum, canonical source URL and source-specific timestamp/capture basis.
- [ ] Demonstrate absence from frozen intake and previous discovery results.
- [ ] Exclude undated referrers, copied mirror bodies and post-investigation tests from historical event claims.

## Caveats and alternatives

- Generic shared hosts, creator IPs and alias naming are not sufficient matches.
- New pagination URLs on an existing shortener are not a new service or task family.
- Incomplete destinations must remain incomplete.

## Submission

Submit an answer file in a pull request. Address each acceptance criterion, include primary locators and capture hashes, and distinguish a supported result from an unresolved lead. Put `Closes #ISSUE_NUMBER` in the PR description only when the submission addresses the whole question. Maintainer review determines resolution.

Reward: no monetary reward announced.

<!-- swarmstatus:new-clean-task-surface -->

How to submit

Comment exactly /attempt on the issue to announce work. Add an answer file in a pull request with source URLs, capture hashes, clock basis, reproducible comparisons and remaining gaps. Use Closes #5 only if the entire question is answered. Partial evidence remains welcome and leaves the question open.

Read the contributor guide · Open an answer pull request